2 December 2010 — High Court Ruling Against Intersex Prisoner, Kenya

In the case, Richard Muasya v. the Hon. Attorney General, High Court of Kenya on 2 December 2010, Muasya lost his case of claiming violations of his constitutional rights, in which he asked for the legalisation of a third gender.

Richard was born with ambiguous genitalia and could therefore not obtain a birth certificate, identity card or passport. He was arrested on 16 March 2005 for aggravated robbery.

Despite the Court recognising that Muasya’s condition fitted its definition of intersex, the Court found that because there was no verifiable data about intersex people as a group or class in Kenyan society, the treatment of intersex people was not a matter of public interest. They also found that he did not have a right to legal recognition or protection against discrimination. They also found that he had not been discriminated against in his schooling, employment and that his inability to attain identity documents was his fault and that his inability to vote was therefore his failing. The Court thus ruled that his freedom of movement had not been violated as it was his responsibility to attain the relevant identity documents. The Court also held that the social stigma Muasya suffered was not a legal issue.

The Court found in favour of Muasya’s claim that he had been subjected to inhuman and degrading treatment in prison and he was awarded damages of 500,000 Kenyan Shillings.

During the period leading up to the trial and after, Muasya was sexually abused and his rights violated for 8 years as an intersex person confined with male prisoners in Kamiti Maximum prison.

Read more here.